Shiv Ratan Yadav @ Natta @ Nate v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49720 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2021 Thana- FULKAHA District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

SHIV RATAN YADAV @ NATTA @ NATE Son of Rajo Yadav @ Rajendra Yadav Resident of Village - Bhawanipur, Ward no.5, P.s.- Fulkaha, Distt.- Araria.

2.

Mahesh Yadav @ Ramesh Yadav Son of Late Rameshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Bhawanipur, Ward no.5, P.s.- Fulkaha, Distt.- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrigendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section-30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 432 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against them. They have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is alleged that 432 litres wine is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49720 of 2021(2) dt.17-11-2021 2/2 recovered from the car. The petitioners are not owners of the car in question. The names of the petitioners have transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Araria in connection with Fulkaha P.S. Case No. 31 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T