Kamod Narayan Kumar, v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.219 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5438 of 2019 ====================================================== Kamod Narayan Kumar, Son of Late Ram Chandra Kumar, Resident of Village and Post- Kutka, P.S.- Singhwara, District- Darbhanga, presently residing as New Khajasarai, Laheriasarai, Kharajpur, P.O. and P.S.- Laheriasarai, Dist.- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary Sri Sanjay Kumar, son of name not known, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 2.

Sri Sanjay Kumar, Son of name not known, the Principle Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Sri Vijay Kumar Mishra, Son of name not known, the Director, Mass Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Sri Atul Prasad, Son of name not known, the Principle Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

Sri Alok Kumar, Son of name not known, the Director, Integrated Child Development Service, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Indira Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

6.

Sri Shashank Subhankar, Son of name not known, the Collector, Samastipur. 7.

Sri Binay Kumar, Son of name not known, the Additional Collector, Samastipur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kaushalesh Chaudhary, Advocate Mr. Shambhu Nath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lalit Kishore (Ag) Mr. Madhukar Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-07-2022 Heard Mr. Kaushalesh Chaudhary, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Madhukar Mishra for the respondents.

Patna High Court MJC No.219 of 2021 dt.06-07-2022 2/2 Pursuant to the order dated 09.04.2019, the representation preferred by the petitioner has been disposed of by a reasoned order.

Should the petitioner feel aggrieved by the aforesaid order, he has the liberty to challenge the same as it may be assailable on facts and law both.

However, there would be no necessity of continuing with this contempt petition.

The contempt petition is thus consigned and disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) krishna/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 09.07.2022 Transmission Date