Arun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38364 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2026 Thana- BELA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Arun Kumar Son of Satyanarayan Panjiyar R/o Village- Sirsiya Bazar, P.S.- Bela, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastri, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the house of Vijay Kumar Mahto, Nitrazepam 1P- 10mg total 10,000 pieces tablet, Spasmo Proxyvon Plus tablet total 5472 pieces, Blue-Spas Plus total 1056 pieces tablets, Nitrosum-10 total 920 pieces tablets, Nitravet-10 total 390 pieces tablets, I-Koff codeim syrup- 100 ml total 605 pieces, Onerex codeim syrup-100 ml total 149 pieces, Tazowin injection total 38 pieces and three smart phones and Indian, Nepali and American currency were recovered..

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38364 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/2 has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It has further been submitted that the seizure list witnesses are police personnel. Police has not complied Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. while making the seizure. It has further been submitted that petitioner is a staff of Vijay Kumar Mahto that is why he has been framed in this case. He has got no concern with the alleged recovery. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 14.03.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judgecum-Special Judge (NDPS Act), Sitamarhi in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 61 of 2026.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T