Surendra Roy And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.892 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6629 of 1990 ===========================================================

1. Surendra Roy

2. Hari Narain Roy

3. Bankatesh Roy All sons of Late Ramjee Roy

4. Mostt. Baleshwari Kuer wife of Late Ramjee Roy

5. Shyam Bihari Roy son of Late Chandra Bilash Roy

6. Baldeo Roy

7. Prabhu Nath Roy Both sons of late Shambhu Roy

8. Bimal Roy

9. Shekhar Roy Both sons of Late Deo Krishna Roy

10. Banshidhar Roy

11. Sri Krishna Roy Both sons of Late Kunjan Roy All resident of village - Katherain, P.O. Siyadih, P.S. Charpokhari, District- Bhojpur at Ara.

.... (Petitioners in CWJC No. 6629/1990) .... Appellants

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara.

3. Ram Bachan Sah

4. Nirmal Sah

5. Sudarshan Sah Sons of Late Gupteshwar Sah

6. Chandrama Ram

7. Siyadhar Ram

8. Rudal Ram Sons of deceased Brind Ram

9. Hasmuddin Mia

10. Noor Hussan Mia Both sons of Late Saziz Mia.

11. Bithal Ram son of Deo Raj Ram

12. Dhora Ram son of Hira Ram All resident of village- Katherain, P.O. Siyadih, P.S. Charpokhari, District- Bhojpur at Ara.

.... (Respondents in CWJC No. 6629/1990) .... Respondents with =========================================================== Letters Patent Appeal No. 1504 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6420 of 1990 ===========================================================

1. Surendra Roy

2. Hari Narain Roy

3. Bankatesh Roy Sons of Late Ramjee Roy

Patna High Court LPA No.892 of 2015 dt.08-08-2017 2/3

4. Mostt. Baleshwari Kuer widow of Ramjee Roy

5. Chakeshwar Roy, son of Late Nand Gopal Roy

6. Sushil Roy

7. Anil Roy Both sons of Late Budhan Roy

8. Sheo Shankar Singh son of Late Banarsi Singh

9. Mangeri Kuer wife of Late Bishwanath Rai

10. Jirmano Kuer wife of Late Gaya Roy

11. Janako Devi, wife of Sri Saukhin Singh

12. Kusum Kuer, wife of Ram Prapan Singh

13. Madhuri Devi, wife of Jag Bahadur Rai,

14. Shyam Bihari Roy, son of Late Chandra Bilash Roy

15. Baldeo Roy

16. Prabhu Nath Roy Both sons of Late Shambhu Roy

17. Bimal Roy

18. Shekhar Roy, Both sons of Late Deo Krishna Roy

19. Ram Sagar Roy, Son of Late Mangal Roy

20. Mostt. Ram Rato Kuer @ Devi widow of Late Kunjan Roy

21. Banshidhar Roy

22. Sri Krishna Roy @ Krishna Roy Both sons of Late Kunjan Roy

23. Kamta Roy,

24. Harendra Roy,

25. Narendra Roy,

26. Surendra Roy, Sons of Late Bindeshwari Roy

27. Somanati Devi, wife of Late Bindeshwari Roy

28. Saraswati Devi, wife of Ram Naresh Pandey

29. Rekha Devi, wife of Ram Twakya Pandey All resident of village- Katherain, P.O.- Siyadih, P.S.- Charpokhari, District- Bhojpur at Ara .... (Petitioners in CWJC No. 6420 of 1990) .... Appellants

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara

3. Ram Bachan Sah

4. Nirmal Sah

5. Sudarshan Sah Sons of Late Gupetenshwar Sah

6. Chandrama Ram,

7. Siyadhar Ram

8. Rudal Ram Sons of deceased Brinda Ram

9. Hasmuddin Mia

10. Noor Hussan Mia, Sons of Late Saziz Mia

11. Bishwa Nath Ram

12. Ram Agaya Ram

13. Ramdeo Ram

14. Ramdeyal Ram @ Jita Ram

Patna High Court LPA No.892 of 2015 dt.08-08-2017 3/3 All sons of Late Mukha Ram

15. Suresh Kanu, son of Late Lotan Kanu All residents of village- Katherain, P.O. Siyadih, P.S.- Charpokhari, District- Bhojpur at Ara .... (Respondents in CWJC No. 6420/1990) .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

(In LPA No.892 of 2015) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ras Bihari Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

(In LPA No.1504 of 2015) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ras Bihari Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 08-08-2017 I.A. No. 4453/2016 and I.A. No. 4452/2016 have been filed in support of the proof of compromise entered into between the parties.

Since the parties have entered into compromise, both the appeals have lost their meaning now. No adjudication or interference is warranted with the impugned order.

Both the appeals are dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 11.08.2017 Transmission Date N/A