Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33209/2016bail granted

Sikandar Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-23Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33209 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2015 Thana -SINGHESHWARASHTHAN DistrictMADHEPURA ====================================================== Sikandar Chauhan, Son of Late Ram Kumar Chauhan, Resident of village- Budhabe, P.S. Singheshwar, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 23-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 09.05.2016 in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 71 of 2015 for the offences alleged under Sections 366A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event, the thrust of accusation is against other accused persons as evident from the deposition of the girl in question recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Similarly situated co-accused Rajo Chauhan has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 26050 of 2016

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 71 of 2015 with the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33209 of 2016 (2) dt.23-08-2016 2/2 petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/-Ibrar U T