Stendra Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37867 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2025 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Stendra Tiwari S/o Late Rajesh Tiwari Vill.- Sarangpur Diyara, PSMaharuaa, Distt.- Ambedkar Nagar (Uttar Pradesh) 2.
Pawan Tiwari S/o Jaswant Tiwari Vill.- Okhala Tank, PS- Okhala Eastern Delhi, Distt.- Eastern Delhi At present- D Block, Faridabad, PS- Surajkund, Distt.- Faridabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Milind Kumar Mishra, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Dhanha P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025 dated 09.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, total 282.750 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the Car.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioners was transpired in this case merely on suspicion. The petitioner no. 2
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37867 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/2 is the driver of the seized vehicle and the petitioner no. 1 is the nephew of the petitioner no. 2 and they have no knowledge about the aforesaid seized liquor. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 10.04.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Dhanha P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T