Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19521/2017bail granted

Suresh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-03Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19521 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictNAWADA ======================================================

1. Suresh Singh, Son of Late Yamuna Singh, R/o village - Marwa, P.S. Roh, District - Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Man Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sahin Begam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with G.O. Case No.48 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 10 ltrs. of country-made liquor.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather from below the seat of the petitioner and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody for more than two months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of clean antecedent of the petitioner and remained in custody for more than two months,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19521 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2017 2/2 let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge-II, Nawada in connection with G.O.Case No.48 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U