Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25343/2015disposed

Rajendra Yadav @ Rajo Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2015-07-10Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25343 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -68 Year- 2014 Thana -CHANDRADEEP District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Rajendra Yadav @ Rajo Yadav & Ors son of Late Sheetal Yadav

2. Mukesh Yadav son of Rajo Yadav

3. Rakesh Yadav son of Rajo Yadav

4. Santanu Yadav son of Rajo Yadav

5. Manoj Yadav son of Gobardhan Yadav

6. Pramod Yadav son of Gobardhan Yadav All residents of village Itabandh, P.S. Chandradeep, District Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Shankar Das(Spl.P.P.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-07-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Chandradeep P.S. Case No.68 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 504, 452 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3(1) (x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamui.

The prosecution case is that all the accused persons, variously armed with entered into the house of the informant,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25343 of 2015 (2) dt.10-07-2015 2/2 assaulted, abused by calling caste name and looted ornaments and cash of Rs.5,000/- from the informant. Specific accusation of assault is against petitioner no.5, Manoj Yadav. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the case lodged by the petitioners' side at earlier point of time and in the background of land dispute, the accusation has been levelled. Moreover, the injury has been found simple. The aforesaid facts constitute good ground for consideration of prayer for regular bail.

Let the learned Court below consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners, if the petitioners surrender within a period of six weeks.

With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U T