Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18225/2017bail granted

Jitendra Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-21Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18225 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -11 Year- 2017 Thana -JOGBANI District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Jitendra Mandal, son of Late Chano Mandal @ Chanan Mandal, resident of village - Naya Tola, Ward No. 11, Forbesganj, P.S. Forbesganj, Distt. - Araria .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh -5, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Jogbani P.S.Case No. 11 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30/38 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation against the petitioner is that there is recovery of 85 bottles, each containing 300 ml. of Nepali liquor. However, it has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for about three months.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18225 of 2017 (2) dt.21-04-2017 2/2 facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Jogbani P.S.Case No. 11 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U