Vyas Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38537 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2024 Thana- CHAKARANDHA P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== VYAS PASWAN S/O INDRADEO PASWAN R/O VILL-BARHA, PSCHHAKARBANDHA, DIST-GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md Jubair Ansari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chhakarbandha P.S. Case No. 9 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 103(1), 238, 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Earlier vide order dated 19.02.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 82582 of 2024, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner was rejected by this Court taking into account the role of the petitioner in the alleged offence.
4. Prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with other accused persons committed the murder of the informant's brother.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38537 of 2025(4) dt.26-09-2025 2/3
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of bail. He mainly submitted that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 19.08.2024 and there is no significant progress in the trial nor there is any likelihood of conclusion of trial in near future and therefore, petitioner may be released on bail. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
7. As per the report dated 26.08.2025 sent by the learned court below, it appears that charge has been framed on 08.08.2025 and the trial is at the stage of prosecution evidence.
8. Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties, this Court finds no fresh ground to reconsider the matter which has already been decided on merit by this Court as also taking into account the present stage of trial, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
9. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.
10. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38537 of 2025(4) dt.26-09-2025 3/3
11. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew the prayer for grant of bail before the Trial Court if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months from today. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T