← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/2260/2019allowed

Raju Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-11Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2260 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2014 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Raju Yadav Son of Lekha Yadav Resident of Village- Dumri Tapsa, Police Station- Fatehpur, District- Gaya.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 11-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 14.05.2019 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Gaya, in SC/ST Trial Case No.482 of 2018, arising out of Fatehpur Police Station Case No.316 of 2014, registered under Sections 341/323/379/354/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Considering the nature of allegation and background of allegation that land dispute is reason for dispute

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2260 of 2019 dt.11-06-2019 2/2 between the parties. In my view, the appellant deserves regular bail. Hence, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13.06.2019 Transmission Date 13.06.2019