Pradeep Kumar Chauhan @ Pradeep Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15277 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -120 Year- 2016 Thana -GURUA District- GAYA ====================================================== PRADEEP KUMAR CHAUHAN @ PRADEEP CHAUHAN son of late Baleshwar Beldar, Resident of Pasi Tola, Gurua, P.S. Gurua, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Bharti For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Gurua P.S.Case No.120 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 461, 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is allegation of recovery of Mobile from the possession of the petitioner and there is also allegation of theft of Mobile in a Mobile shop. The petitioner is in custody for five months. He has clean antecedent. He has been falsely implicated in this case as the received mobile is his own Mobile.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15277 of 2017 (2) dt.06-04-2017 2/2 Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sherghati (Gaya) in connection with Gurua P.S.Case No.120 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U