Md Jawed v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40168 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2020 Thana- KATRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Md Jawed Son Of Md Sabir Resident Of Vill- Dumari, P.S.- Katra, DistrictMuzaffarpur 2.

Md Umer Son Of Md Sabir Resident Of Vill- Dumari, P.S.- Katra, DistrictMuzaffarpur 3.

Md. Meraj Son Of Md. Sabir Resident Of Vill- Dumari, P.S.- Katra, DistrictMuzaffarpur 4.

Md. Sabir Son Of Md Usman Resident Of Vill- Dumari, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the father of the informant by means of lathi and danda.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40168 of 2022(2) dt.22-11-2022 2/2 case due to land dispute. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He submits that the police during investigation has given the benefit of Section 41(1) of the Cr.P.C. to the petitioners. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Katra P.S. Case No. 98 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T