Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9843/2017bail granted

Mahtab Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9843 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -305 Year- 2016 Thana -GOVINDGANJ DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Mahtab Alam .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Gulnar Begam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Govindganj P.S.Case No.305 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 419, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no case is made out under Section 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code as he has not cheated anybody and he was only showing bundle of papers covered by notes. He is in custody for more than two months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. In view of the allegations as made against the petitioner and considering the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9843 of 2017 (2) dt.01-03-2017 2/2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Govindganj P.S.Case No.305 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U