Dr. Ram Baran Choudhary v. The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8200 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Dr. Ram Baran Choudhary, son of Late Dasrath Choudhary, resident of VillageCharaun, P.S.- Mufassil Munger, District- Munger, presently residing at MohallaRani Bagan Kumharpara, P.S. Dumka, District- Dumka, (Jharkhand) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University Bhagalpur, through the Vice Chancellor.

2. The Vice Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

3. The Registrar Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

4. The Finance Officer, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

5. The Principal Bhagalpur Evening College, Bhagalpur.

6. The Sidhu Kanhu Murmu University, Dumka through the Vice Chancellor, (Jharkhand).

7. The Vice Chancellor Sidhu Kanhu Murmu University, Dumka (Jharkhand).

8. The Registrar Sidhu Kanhu Murmu University, Dumka (Jharkhand).

9. The Principal S.P. College, Dumka (Jharkhand). .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Pravina Kumari For the Respondent 1 to 4 : Mr. Chandra Kant For Respondent 5 to 9 : Dr A. K. Singh Mr Navendu Kumar Mr Viveka Nand Pathak =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-09-2016 Every litigant or a citizen is supposed to be aware of his right and he must assert it at the earliest and not at his leisure. A preliminary objection is taken by the counsel for the University that effort is sought to be made by filing this writ application at such a belated stage claiming benefit of shifting of his date of promotion when petitioner is a retiree of 30.10.1999. Such settled positions should not be allowed to be unsettled merely because

Patna High Court CWJC No.8200 of 2015 dt.01-09-2016 2/2 petitioner has all the time at his disposal after retiring 17 years ago. Learned counsel representing the University submits that even the relief and pleadings are vague as to when such shifting is expected. That too is a good ground to reject the writ. The writ application is dismissed on the above grounds. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 01.9.2016 Transmission Date