Patna High CourtMJC/4715/2011disposed

Upendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS.

2017-02-20Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4715 of 2011 =========================================================== Upendra Kumar, S/o Dharmeshwar Singh, R/o Village - Dariapur, Karpi, Arwal, District - Arwal .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Mr. Afzal Amanullah, Commissioner - Cum - Secretary, Water Resources Department, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

3. Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Anisabad, Patna, Sri Rambilash Chaudhary

4. Superintending Engineer, Ganga - Sone Flood Security Circle Patna, Sri Narendra Kumar

5. Executive Engineer, Sone Canal Division, Khagaul, Patna, Sri Manoj Kumar

6. Sub - Divisional Officer, Sone Canal Sub - Division, Arwal, Sri Kailesh Prasad Singh

7. Sri J.P. Lal, Executive Engineer, Quality Control Division, Anisabad, Patna

8. Sri Sanjay Singh, Sub - Divisional Officer, Quality Control Sub-Division, Daudnagar, Khagaul, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, G.P. 17 Mr. Amrit Bhushan, A.C. to G.P. 17 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-02-2017 Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the show-cause was filed but the same is not available. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted a photo copy of the show-cause, which is taken on record.

In the show-cause filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5 it is stated that a sum of Rs. 57,234/- has been paid to the petitioner but in respect of refund of security, the petitioner has been

Patna High Court MJC No.4715 of 2011 dt.20-02-2017 2/2 paid an amount of Rs. 17,161/- in excess against running bills as against the security amount of Rs. 17,170/- and, therefore, only Rs. 9/- is refundable to the petitioner.

Since the amount refundable is meager, I do not find that any useful purpose will be served to keep the Contempt Petition pending. The same is disposed of having rendered infructuous. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 23.02.2017 Transmission Date