Ganpat Kumar @ Ganpat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39619 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2024 Thana- INDUSTRIAL District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.
Ganpat Kumar @ Ganpat Yadav, Son of Satyanarayan Yadav, R/O VillageYadav Tola, Fatehpur, P.S- Industrial Area, District- Bhagalpur 2.
Kapil Kumar @ Kapil Yadav, Son of Satyanarayan Yadav, R/O VillageYadav Tola, Fatehpur, P.S- Industrial Area, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-09-2025 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506/34 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of Explosive Susbtance Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners arrived at 8.00 P.M. at the door of the informant, started abusing the informant. Petitioner no. 2 was having a bomb. He threw it at brother of informant Subham Kumar which hit in his leg and he fell down.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39619 of 2025(4) dt.04-09-2025 2/2 petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. From perusal of the injury report of Subham Kumar it will transpire that he has received simple injury. The injury report shows that the nature of weapon is bomb and nature of injury is simple. It has also been submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioners are languishing in judicial custody for more than 11 months.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently the bail of the petitioner.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District Addl. Sessions Judge-IV, Bhagalpur in connection with Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T