Patna High CourtCWJC/17365/2009withdrawn

Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-16Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17365 of 2009 ====================================================== Anil Kumar Singh, S/O Late Ram Pavittar Singh, R/O Rajpati Apartment, Flat No. 302 A Block Ashiana Road, Magistrate Colony, P.S. Rajiv Nagar Distt.- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Secretary, Building Construction Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Engineer In Chief, Building Construction Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. The Chief Engineer, Building Construction Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna

5. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electrical Estimating Division No. 1, Building Construction Deptt., Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amiya Kunal, AC to AAG-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2015 In compliance of the order dated 10.02.2015, a supplementary counter affidavit is being filed on behalf of the respondent no.5 disputing the claims raised on behalf of the petitioner in the main writ petition, which is taken on the record. A rejoinder affidavit on behalf of the petitioner to the aforesaid supplementary counter affidavit is also being filed during the course of hearing of the case showing his entitlement for payment of his dues, which is also taken on the record. In view of nature of the claims raised on behalf of the petitioner in the present writ petition, fully detailed in paragraph no.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17365 of 2009 (4) dt.16-02-2015 Government of Bihar, Patna for redressal of his valid grievances, after raising all the issues, which have been raised in the present writ petition.

Permission is accorded.

The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

It goes without saying that, if such a representation is filed on behalf of the petitioner, the same shall be considered in accordance with law.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Arvind/- U