Rohit Kumar @ Dhoni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36380 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2019 Thana- RAJAOLI DistrictNawada ====================================================== ROHIT KUMAR @ DHONI, aged about 24 years, male, Son of Gopal Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Uper Tanda Rajauli, P.S.- Rajauli, Distt - Nawada.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 25.04.2019 in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 55 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 387, 307, 353, 337, 338 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the F.I.R. is against 19 named and 100 unknown persons. The accusations are general and omnibus in nature without any specific accusation attributed to the petitioner. The petitioner is accused in three prior cases of different nature.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36380 of 2019(2) dt.12-06-2019 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 55 of 2019, on the following conditions- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar/BT U T