Chuman Kumar @ Chuman Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42576 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2023 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Chuman Kumar @ Chuman Paswan S/o Yogendra Paswan @ Yogi Paswan R/o Village-Hathiyahi, P.S.-Piprakothi, District-East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 209 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 272, 273, 341, 323, 332, 333, 353, 308, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 30(a), 32(i), 34(b), 45, 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
3. As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of total 40 liters illicit country made liquor from the house of the co-accused Chhabila Chaudhary and Mahendra Chaudhary and 500 liters pass had also been recovered from the bush and the alleged recovery of paas was destroyed at the place of occurrence. Petitioner is alleged to have fled away from the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42576 of 2024(2) dt.15-07-2024 2/3 place of occurrence and he is also alleged to have abused and assaulted the police officials.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the first information report. Petitioner is merely a member of the mob. Petitioner was not apprehended on the spot. Nothing specific is alleged against this petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The alleged recovery has been made from co-accused Mahendra Chaudhary and Chhabila Chaudhary and petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged recovery. Seizure has not been made as per law. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused Shanti Devi, Saroj Devi, Seema Devi and Rani Devi have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 11.03.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14652 of 2024 and the case of the present petitioner stand on more or less similar footing.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view clean antecedent of the petitioner,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42576 of 2024(2) dt.15-07-2024 3/3 argument advanced on behalf of both sides and the co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Exclusive Special Excise Judge Court-1, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 209 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) mcv/- U T