Prakash Tanti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19381 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -236 Year- 2017 Thana -LAXMIPUR District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Prakash Tanti, Son of Sitaram Tanti, resident of Village Nawkadih, Police Station- Laxamipur, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner has been in custody since 19.12.2017 in connection with Laxamipur P.S. Case No. 236/2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier on the basis of suspicion, he was remanded on 21.10.2017 but subsequently, freed after inquiry. It is further submitted that save and except the petitioner's self-confession in another case, there is no further material in the case diary to implicate the petitioner. It is further submitted that the victim was also recovered, but till date no T.I. Parade has been conducted and the petitioner has been prosecuted on the basis of his self-confession made before the police. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19381 of 2018 (3) dt.02-05-2018 2/2 bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. III, Jamui, in connection with Laxamipur P.S. Case No. 236/2017, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his father.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T