Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33040/2016bail granted

Satyabir Kunwar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-22Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33040 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -178 Year- 2016 Thana -PATORI District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Satyabir Kunwar Son of Uday Kumar Resident of Village- Dumri, P.S. Patory (Mohanpur) O.P. District Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. J.K.Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 10.05.2016 in connection with Patory (Mohanpur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 178 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the co-accused Manish Kumar has been granted bail by the Court of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-6, Samastipur in B.P. No. 386 of 2016. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33040 of 2016 (2) dt.22-08-2016 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Patory (Mohanpur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 178 of 2016on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T