← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15553/2021disposed

Rahul Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-18Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15553 of 2021 ====================================================== Rahul Ranjan Son of Late Jai Prakash Resident of Village- Kurwa Mathiya, P.O. Kumarbag, Police Station- Chanpatia (Kumarbag O.P.), District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, District Compassionate Appointment Committee, West Champaran, Bettiah. 4.

The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah. 5.

The Deputy Collector (Establishment), West Champaran, Bettiah. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Sikta, District- West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brij Kishor Mishra For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md. N. H. Khan ( Sc1 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-01-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this application is being filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or writs for quashing the decision with regard to the petitioner, whose name is appearing against serial no.7 in memo no.644 dated 26.12.2015, passed by the District Compassionate Appointment Committee, West Champaran, Bettiah, consisting with its 8 members headed by the respondent no.3 on the account of delay in filing application for

Patna High Court CWJC No.15553 of 2021(2) dt.18-01-2024 2/2 compassionate appointment.

And For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground on suitable post as per his qualification."

2.

Though it is the stand of the respondent-State that certain documents are required to be furnished by the petitioner for the purposes of grant of appointment on compassionate ground to the petitioner, however, the learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that now, all the documents have already been furnished and the case of the petitioner is being actively considered by the District Compassionate Appointment Committee, West Champaran at Bettiah, hence, it be directed to take a final decision, within a stipulated time frame, preferably within a period of four weeks from today. It is directed accordingly.

3.

The present writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U