Ramprit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2669 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2022 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

RAMPRIT YADAV SON OF CHANDAR YADAV VILLAGEBHARANTOL, P.S.- BISFI, DISTT.- MADHUBANI 2.

RAMDEO YADAV SON OF RAMPRIT YADAV VILLAGEBHARANTOL, P.S.- BISFI, DISTT.- MADHUBANI 3.

RAJDEO YADAV SON OF RAMPRIT YADAV VILLAGE-BHARANTOL, P.S.- BISFI, DISTT.- MADHUBANI ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

SANJEEVAN SADAI SON OF DILCHAN SADAI VILLAGEBHARANTOL BISFI, P.S.- BISFI, DISTT.- MADHUBANI ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellants :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Usha Kumari 1, , Spl.PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-08-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. At the outset, it is submitted by learned S.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State that the prayer for pre-arrest bail of these appellants is not maintainable, as cognizance has already been taken by the learned trial court also for the offences punishable under the SC/ST Act. In this regard, reliance is placed in the case of Bachu Das Vs. State of Bihar and others, reported in (2014) 3 Supreme Court Cases 471.

3. In view of the aforesaid submissions and

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2669 of 2024(2) dt.31-08-2024 2/2 pronouncement of law rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bachu Das (supra), appellants' prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail is dismissed.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T