Ranjit Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46983 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2025 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ranjit Paswan Son of Late Ram Prabhu Paswan R/o Vill - Kolhuara, Ward No.06, P.S - Kalayanpur, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Krina Kumari @ Karina Kumari D/O Sanjay Paswan R/O Vill- Kolhuara , Police Station- KalyanPur, Distt.- Samastipur . ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP For the Informant :

Ms. Rani Shashi Bharti, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defect no. 6(3), as pointed out by the office, is hereby ignored.

3. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 109, 352, 303(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is father of Golu Kumar @ Rahul. It is next submitted that the informant alleges

2/4 that on 12.01.2025, Golu came on the roof and started behaving inappropriately with her when she was sleeping, further when she woke up, she protested, on which Golu threatened her with a pistol, but on alarm her family members came and Golu fled, it is next alleged that on 13.01.2025, the family members of Golu came to the house of the informant and petitioner assaulted the father of the informant by an iron rod causing injury on head, it is also alleged that the accused persons also assaulted other family members of the informant including the informant injuring them.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that informant alleges that Golu @ Rahul on 12.01.2025 in the night came on the roof of the informant and started acting inappropriately, but then no FIR was instituted on the next day, rather the instant FIR came to be instituted on 15.01.2025 after the occurrence of assault is alleged to have been committed by the family members of Golu @ Rahul on 13.01.2025. It is also submitted that from perusal of the FIR, it would manifest that the FIR has been instituted based on a written application of the

3/4 informant. It is thus submitted that had Golu entered the house of the informant and acted inappropriately with her, then why no FIR came to be instituted instantly. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the blow was not repeated and the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature. It is also submitted that petitioner is not a criminal.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Rabindra Kumar and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, but then are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that FIR was instituted after a delay of two days and the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and the blow was not repeated.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kalyanpur P.S.

4/4 Case No. 22 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.

8. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T