← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42495/2019bail granted

Julekha Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-10Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42495 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2014 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== Julekha Khatoon, aged about 28 years, F, Wife of Md. Mustaque @ Md. Mustaque Nirala Resident of Village - Banki, P.S.- Rupauli, (Akbarpur) Distt - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Adv.

Ms. Preety Kunwawr, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Rupouli (Akbarpur) P.S. Case No. 67 of 2014 registered for offences under sections 420/465/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been alleged that on the basis of fraudulent act, the petitioner has obtained the service of Anganwari Sevika and, later on, she was dismissed from service.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not taken any single farthing by way of remuneration.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42495 of 2019(2) dt.10-07-2019 2/2 Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Purnea in connection with Rupoli (Akbarpur) P.S. Case No. 67 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, she will remain present and if she would not present herself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T