Mr. Bijuli Musahar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49241 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-809 Year-2019 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

MR. BIJULI MUSAHAR, Son of Late Ghamandi Musahar, Resident of Village - Pali, P.S.- Bihta, Distt.- Patna.

2.

Smt. Puja Devi @ Bhuri Devi, D/o Late Ghamandi Musahar, Resident of Village - Pali, P.S.- Bihta, Distt.- Patna.

3.

Suganti Kumari @ Bhanta Kumari, D/o Late Ghamandi Musahar, Resident of Village - Pali, P.S.- Bihta, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. K.M.Joseph, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Bihta P.S. Case No. 809 of 2019 for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 379, 504, 506 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they have assaulted the informant and injured him.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49241 of 2021(3) dt.25-04-2022 2/3 petitioners are members of a weaker section of the society and they were troubled by the informant and they have also filed a case before the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and thereafter their F.I.R. has been registered and therefore, they should be granted anticipatory bail. Considered the submissions of the parties.

The charge-sheet shows that police investigated the case and has found the allegations true but the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge-sheet has been submitted on insufficient evidence.

In the facts of this case, this anticipatory bail application on behalf of petitioner no.1, above named, is dismissed.

Considering the fact that petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are females, their anticipatory bail application is allowed. Accordingly, let the petitioner nos. 2 and 3, above named, in the event of their arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, District- Patna, in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 809 of 2019, subject to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49241 of 2021(3) dt.25-04-2022 3/3 the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T