← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10684/2021dismissed

Anita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-22Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10684 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2019 Thana- CHHAURADANO District- East Champaran ====================================================== Anita Devi Wife Of Ramashankar Prasad R/O Village Bhelwa Ps Chhauradano District East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Ritik Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Son Of Om Prasad Resident Of Village- Post And P.S.- Chauradano, District- East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. The present application has been filed for cancellation of the bail granted to Opposite Party No. 2 vide order dated 13.01.2020 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 303 of 2019 / POCSO Trial No. 05 of 2020, initially registered under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, by order dated 16.01.2019, Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act were also added in the said case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10684 of 2021(4) dt.22-07-2026 2/2

3. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the materials available on record, this Court finds that no supervening circumstance has been brought on record to show that Opposite Party No. 2 has misused the privilege of bail or violated any of the conditions imposed by the learned court below. No material has been placed before this Court to justify interference with the order granting bail. Therefore, this Court finds no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order.

4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed.

5. However, the learned Special Judge is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of this order. The learned Trial Court shall submit a compliance report before this Court after expiry of the said period.

6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Principal District & Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari through FAX or e-mail for immediate compliance. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T