Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43524/2023dismissed

Indu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-24Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43524 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2020 Thana- CHAORI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Indu Kumari W/O Ravi Raushan Kumar Chaudhary @ D/O Jai Kishun Chaudhary R/O Village- Suphara, Ps. Karakat, Dist. Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar 2.

Ravi Raushan Kumar Chaudhary S/O Mahesh Choudhary R/O VillageHarpurlakh, Ps. Chauri, Dist. Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Ataul Haque, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2026 Seen the Office notes.

2. Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the Office, be ignored.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

4. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking cancellation of the bail granted to the O.P. No. 2 vide order dated 24.04.2023 passed by the learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Bhojpur, Ara in Chauri P.S. Case No. 92 of 2020 arising out of G.R. No. 5269 of 2020.

5. Perused the records.

6. Having considered the submissions of the parties

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43524 of 2023(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/2 and the materials available on record, this Court finds that no supervening circumstance has been brought on record to show that O.P. No. 2 has misused the privilege of bail or violated any of the conditions imposed by the learned court below. No material has been placed before this Court to justify interference with the order granting bail. Therefore, this Court finds no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order.

7. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed.

8. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of this order. The learned Trial Court shall submit a compliance report before this Court after expiry of the said period.

9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Ara through FAX or e-mail for immediate compliance. (Sandeep Kumar, J) sadique/- U T