Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8002/2017bail granted

Amarjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-23Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8002 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -125 Year- 2016 Thana -BARIYARPUR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Amarjeet Kumar, son of Bhola Saw @ Bhola Sah, resident of Mohalla Lallu Pokhar, P.S.- Kasimbazar, District- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Bariyarpur P.S.Case No. 125 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that two vehicles were intercepted at the same time and from the vehicle in which petitioner was traveling 33 litres of foreign liquor has been recovered and petitioner has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for three months.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the period of custody of the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8002 of 2017 (2) dt.23-02-2017 2/2 petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in connection with Bariyarpur P.S.Case No. 125 of 2016, corresponding to G.R.No. 2145 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U