← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26504/2016bail granted

Ram Babu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2016-07-12Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26504 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -25 Year- 2015 Thana -KHAGARIA GRP CASE District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Ram Babu Ram, son of Ram Bahadur Ram, resident of Village- Naya Tola, Police Station- Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, Adv. For the State : Smt. Gulnar Begam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 12-07-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 379 Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the stolen articles were allegedly recovered from the joint house of the Petitioner and he has fair antecedent and Bachchan Kumar, his cousin brother, undertakes his responsibility, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in connection with Khagaria Rail P.S. Case No. 25 of 2015, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26504 of 2016 (2) dt.12-07-2016 2/2 affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner and the other shall be the cousin brother of the Petitioner namely, Bachchan Kumar. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

(iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. (Anjana Prakash, J) S.