Bulet Thakur @ Bullet Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33127 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -288 Year- 2015 Thana -MAJHAULIA District- WESTCHAMPARAN (BETTIAH) ====================================================== Bulet Thakur @ Bullet Thakur Son of Ramjash Thakur @ Chhatar Thakur Resident of Village- Mahanao, P.S. Majhaulia, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 02.06.2016 in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 288 of 2015 for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 376, 504 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as there is a case and counter case between the parties in which the present petitioner's side had instituted FIR at the earlier point of time. The present FIR has been instituted after inordinate delay of three days on 09.06.2015 for the alleged occurrence of 06.06.2015. Even according to the FIR, the accusations are highly improbable as the father and brother of the informant are said to have been standing at the door when the petitioner was leaving.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33127 of 2016 (2) dt.22-08-2016 2/2 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 288 of 2015 with the following conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/-Ibrar U T