Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42673/2024bail granted

Ravi Chaupal v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-25Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42673 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2019 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ravi Chaupal S/O Bauku Chaupal R/O Village-Gangauli, P.S.-Pandaul, DisttMadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No. 311 of 2019 dated 21.12.2019 registered for the offences punishable u/s 457, 380 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 20.12.2019, some unknown miscreants broke the lock and committed theft of gold, silver, generator, coffee machine, two amplifier from the house of the informant and they also committed theft of some ornaments and Rs. 13,000/- cash from the villager house of the Madan Ram. On the same day they also committed theft from the house of Shankar Sahu.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42673 of 2024(2) dt.25-06-2024 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. The allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 08.04.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the allegation levelled against the petitioner and the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani, in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No. 311 of 2019.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Jyoti/- U T