Ravi Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19334 of 2017 (2) dt.19-05-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19334 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -509 Year- 2016 Thana -GOPALGANJ TOWN District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Rai, Son of Satendra Rai, Resident of village - Dahibhatta, P.S. Uchkagaon, District - Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Binod Kumar 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No. 509 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, a stolen motorcycle was recovered from the possession of this petitioner.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is in custody since 06.12.2016 and has stated on oath that besides one case bearing Barhariya P.S. Case No. 260 of 2016 he has got no criminal antecedent. He has been made victim of circumstances, the Police got recorded the statement forcibly. Similarly situated co-accused Rabindra Manjhi has already been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 14296 of 2017 and further other

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19334 of 2017 (2) dt.19-05-2017 co-accused Rajeshwar Roy and Bharat Prasad have also been allowed bail and as such the petitioner deserve sympathetic consideration.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No. 509 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T