Bipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49643 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-469 Year-2020 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Bipin Kumar Son Of Mishrilal Mandal Resident Of Village - Keshv Nagar, P.S.- Pipra, District - Supaul 2.

Bipin Kumar Thakur Son Of Nand Kishor Thakur Resident Of Chak Dumaria, P.S. And District - Supaul.

3.

Ranjeet Kumar Son Of Shyam Sunder Ram Resident Of Village - Situhar, P.S. And District - Supaul.

4.

Chandeshwar Mandal Son Of Late Domi Mandal Resident Of Village - Rajpur, P.S. And District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 419, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are said to have committed forgery in physical examination for appointment of Home Guard Constable.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49643 of 2021(2) dt.28-04-2022 2/2 petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that occurrence took place on 19.10.2019 but the FIR has been lodged on 03.07.2020 i.e. about 9 months after the alleged occurrence. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts that there is 9 months delay in lodging the FIR, the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 469 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T