Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33086/2016bail granted

Mukesh Sahni @ Mukesh Kumar Sahni @ Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-14Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33086 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2012 Thana -BHANGAHA District- WEST CHAMPARAN (BETTIAH) ====================================================== Mukesh Sahni @ Mukesh Kumar Sahni @ Mukesh Kumar, son of Laxman Sahani, resident of Gobarahiya Malahi Tola, P.S. Laukariya, District West Champaran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kr Singh No. 1, Advocate For the Opposite Party: Smt Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 14-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the fourth attempt on behalf of the petitioner, who has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Bhangaha P.S. Case No. 24 of 2012 having earlier been rejected by the last order dated 03.05.2016 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 10366 of 2016.

3. It is submitted that there has been no progress in production of the prosecution witnesses since the year 2014 and there is no chance of early conclusion of the trial. Similarly situated co-accused Jai Ram Sahni has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 42613 of 2014.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Tr. No. 02/2013 arising out of Bhangaha P.S. Case No. 24 of 2012 subject to the following conditions -

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33086 of 2016 (3) dt.14-09-2016 2/2 (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U T