Kumar Ravi Ranjan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20340 of 2011 ======================================================
1. Kumar Ravi Ranjan, S/O Mahendra Prasad, Vill- Arang, P.O. - Basdihan, P.S. - Dinara, District - Rohtas.
2. Sunil Kumar, S/O Md. Narayan Singh, Vill- Sarna, P.O. - Bhaluni Dham, P.S. - Dinara, Dist.- Rohtas.
3. Phul Kumari, D/O Rambacchan Singh, Vill- Rampur, P.O. - Sarao, P.S. Natwar, Dist.- Rohtas.
4. Wasim Akram, S/O Abdul Quadir, Vill - Parasia, P.O. - Kocash, Dist. - Rohtas.
5. Meena Kumari, D/O Rambacchan Singh, Vill - Rampur, P.O. - Sarao, P.S. - Natwar, Dist.- Rohtas.
6. Kusum Kumari, D/O Birendra Singh, Vill - Panditpura, P.O. - Akorha, P.S. - Dinara, Dist.- Rohtas.
7. Aayesha Khatoon, D/O Md. Luqueman, Vill- Mauna, P.O. - Taraon, P.S.- Nasariganj, Dist.- Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.
3. The Member, District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority, Rohtas (Sasaram).
4. The District Education Officer, Rohtas(Sasaram).
5. The Block Development Officer, Block - Dinara, Dist.- Rohtas (Sasaram).
6. The Block Education Officer, Block Dinara, Dist.- Rohtas (Sasaram).
7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Karanj, Block - Dinara, Dist.- Rohtas (Sasaram).
8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Karanj, Block - Dinara, Dist.- Rohtas (Sasaram).
9. Ravindra Kumar, S/O Sri Keshao Prasad, R/O Vill- Karanj, P.S. - Dinara, Dist.- Rohtas (Sasaram).
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sushil Kumar Roy and Mr. Amaresh Kr. Singh, Advocates.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-11-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ application with a liberty to prefer an
Patna High Court CWJC No.20340 of 2011 (7) dt.20-11-2017 2/2 appeal before the State Appellate Authority, challenging the order dated 15.04.2011, contained in Memo No. 383 dated 15.04.2011, passed in Case No. 124/2010 by the Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Rohtas at Sasaram. Permission is accorded.
The petitioners shall file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of thirty days from the date of the order, which shall be disposed of in accordance with law within the statutory period.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners were granted interim relief by this Court on 05.12.2011. The petitioners will be at liberty to file a separate application before the State Appellate Authority, if so advised, for any interim relief during the pendency of the appeal, within a period of ten days from the date of filing of the appeal. The said application filed by the petitioners shall be disposed of within a period of twenty days.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ application stands disposed of.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U