Anand Kumar @ Anand Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37882 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2024 Thana- SIMRAHA District- Araria ====================================================== Anand Kumar @ Anand Mandal Son Of Yogendra Mandal R/O Vill- Tihla, Ward No 9, P.S- Simraha, Distt.- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrigendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Simraha P.S. Case No. 181 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 74, 352, 303(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

The learned APP, at the outset, submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted, carries punishment of less than seven years, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that investigation in the case against the petitioner is still continuing but then the petitioner has not been given notice under Section 35 of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37882 of 2025(2) dt.25-06-2025 2/2 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), on which learned APP submits that Section 35 BNSS is akin to Section 41 Cr.P.C. It is next submitted that this Court considered the scope of Section 41(A) Cr.P.C. by an order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar). Learned APP, thus, submits that petitioner be directed to file a representation before the authorities concerned under Section 35 BNSS. 5.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case, within a period of three weeks from today, in terms of Section 35 BNSS; and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the provisions contained in Section 35 BNSS.

6.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned District Judge, Araria and the Superintendent of Police, Araria for their perusal and onward communication to the learned District and Sessions Judge-IV, Araria and the Investigating Office of the case. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T