Raj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5148 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2016 Thana -MATIHANI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Raj Kumar, son of Ram Balak Singh, Resident of Village- Sihma Baburbanni, P.S.- Matihani, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Upendra Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Murlidhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 118 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act and Section 47(a) of Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though there is allegation of recovery one stolen motorcycle and other article from the possession of the petitioner, however he has remained in judicial custody for about four months and he has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence and period of custody, and also that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5148 of 2017 (2) dt.15-02-2017 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 118/2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

It is also made clear if the petitioner again found involved in any of the offence, his bail bonds will be cancelled. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T