Bablu Kumar @ Bablu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36734 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2019 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== BABLU KUMAR @ BABLU KUMAR SINGH Son of Sudarshan Singh, Resident of Village - Garkha, P.S.- Garkha, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Narendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 140 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. It has been alleged that 3 litres 510 ML liquor has been recovered in presence of two independent witnesses. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Looking to the quantity of liquor and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36734 of 2019(2) dt.17-06-2019 2/2 to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 140 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail bond.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T