Meraj Mian @ Meraj Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41628 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-605 Year-2024 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
MERAJ MIAN @ MERAJ ALAM Son of GYASU MIAN @ GAYASUDDIN MIAN R/O VILLAGE- MAHESADA GOPALPUR POLICE STATION- GOPALPUR DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN 2.
Irphan Mian Son of Gyasu Mian @ Gayasuddin Mian R/O VILLAGEMAHESADA GOPALPUR POLICE STATION- GOPALPUR DISTRICTWEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sarvesh Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Majhauliya P.S Case No. 605 of 2024, for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 3/5 of the B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution story, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, petitioners and other accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant's nephew by giving knife blow causing injury on his stomach and waist due to which he fell down.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Both the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41628 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 parties are co-villagers and there is a previous enmity between the parties. As per impugned order, injuries have been found simple in nature. As a matter of fact, the case has amicably been compromised between the parties and both parties do not want to proceed further in this case. Petitioners have clean antecedent.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that the petitioner no. 2 is the main accused of assaulting with knife blow on the informant's nephew due to which he got injured.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and also submission of the parties, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to these petitioners.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of these petitioners stands rejected.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T