Chhedi Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24326 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -66 Year- 2014 Thana -BHARGAWAN District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Chhedi Singh, Son of Late Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Paikpar, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr.Indiwar Kumari (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bhargama PS case No. 66/2014 for the offence under section 392 in which after investigation charge sheet has been submitted under section 384 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the informant was going to the house of his friend to give him Rs. 60,000/- for marriage of his daughter. The petitioner looted the motor cycle and money on the point of Bhala for which Panchayat was held in which petitioner promised to return the money and motor cycle but later on he refused. It is further alleged that son of petitioner was working in GTFS as junior to the informant who had taken police in the name of petitioner and his wife from Reliance

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24326 of 2015 (2) dt.13-07-2015 2/2 Insurance Corporation but he failed to carry on the policy after only two installments and the petitioner committed the alleged incident in order to illegally get his money back. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the case has been found to be false under section 392 of the IPC in course of investigation and the police submitted charge sheet under section 384 of the IPC. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case due to village politics. It has been submitted on behalf of the State that the petitioner is named in the first information report.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S. K. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Araria in connection with Bhargama PS case No. 66/2014, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

(Sudhir Singh, J) BKS/- U T