Ajay Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18705 of 2017 ====================================================== Ajay Sharma, son of Chandrika Sharma, Resident of village- Machhagra, P.S.- Bhagwanpur Hat, District- Siwan.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 23.11.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 43988 of 2016 by which the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail in connection with Siwan Mahila P.S. Case No. 205 of 2014, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I (Special Judge), Siwan under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 506, 354(B), 376, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6/8 of POCSO Act and the petitioner was directed to surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks and furnish bail bond Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to some unavoidable reason the petitioner could not surrender in the court below well within time.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18705 of 2017 (2) dt.20-04-2017 2/2 It is further prayed on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner that further time may be extended so that the petitioner could surrender in the court below and furnish bail bond. Considering the submissions made on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner and the grounds mentioned in the modification application, the period of surrender of the petitioner in the court below is extended for a further period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of the order. The order dated 23.11.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 43988 of 2016, is modified to the extent as indicated above. The modification application is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T