Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13927/2017bail granted

Vikash Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-24Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13927 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -342 Year- 2016 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBHAGALPUR ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Yadav, son of Koko Yadav, resident of Village - Jicho, P.S. Lodipur, District - Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) P.S.Case No. 342 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 511 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1 b) a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. As per learned counsel for the petitioner, though petitioner was arrested but recovered pistol was produced by private person and not by police and he is in custody for more than eight months having clean antecedent.

Heard learned APP also, who has not controverted the above submission.

Having heard both sides and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13927 of 2017 (2) dt.24-03-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) P. S.Case No. 342 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U