Sirchand Manjhi @ Sirchan Manjhi @ Sichan Manjhi @ Sri Chand Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35768 of 2016 (2) dt.31-08-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35768 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -133 Year- 2015 Thana -KARPI District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Sirchand Manjhi @ Sirchan Manjhi @ Sichan Manjhi @ Sri Chand Manjhi son of Sri Dukhan Manjhi resident of Village- Azad Nagar, P.S.- Karpi, District- Arwal.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Murari Prasad Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 31.03.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5315 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 08.08.2015, similarly situated co-accused Amresh Manjhi has been allowed bail vide order dated 21.07.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 19185 of 2016 by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court, general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner, no specific injury has been attributed against the petitioner and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

Learned APP fairly submits that co-accused Amresh Manjhi has been allowed bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35768 of 2016 (2) dt.31-08-2016 In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of custody, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge V, Jehanabad in S. Tr. No. 227 of 2015 / 42 of 2016 arising out of Karpi P.S. Case No. 133 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T