Jitendra Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13785 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -877 Year- 2010 Thana -SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSARAN ====================================================== Jitendra Singh, Son of Yogendra Singh, resident of village - Aarna, Police Station - Masrakh, District - Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Renu Devi, Wife of Jitendra Singh, Daughter of Manager Singh, presently residing at village - Bishunpur Jagdish, Police Station - Marhowrah, District Saran at Chapra.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ------------- 20-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.877 of 2010 registered under Sections 323, 379 and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code besides Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

There is allegation of demand and torture and making attempt to set the complainant/opposite party no.2 on fire against the petitioner and his family members for non fulfillment of the dowry demand. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner happens to be the husband of the complainant/opposite

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13785 of 2015 (2) dt.20-05-2015 2/2 party no.2 and the marriage of the complainant/opposite party no.2 was performed with the petitioner on 26.04.1999 and out of their wedlock, there is three children. It is further submitted that the petitioner is still ready to keep the complainant/opposite party no.2 with full honour and dignity.

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender by him within four weeks, be enlarged on provisional bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Saran at Chapra, in connection with Complaint Case No.877 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Learned trial court is directed to issue notice to the complainant/opposite party no.2 and make attempt to resolve the dispute in between the petitioner and the complainant/opposite party no.2 by taking all possible efforts and if the dispute is resolved in between the petitioner and the complainant/opposite party no.2, then confirm the provisional bail of the petitioner. If the dispute is not resolved in between them, then the trial court will pass the order on its own merit. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T