Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33103/2016bail granted

Sunil Raj v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-23Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33103 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -332 Year- 2016 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Sunil Raj Son of Rajbansh Singh Resident of village - Pachaswan, P.S. Sasaram ( Muffasil ), District - Rohtas .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sada Nand Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 23-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 25.04.2016 in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S Case No. 332 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely on the confessional statement taken in Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 167 of 2016, who had named the petitioner along with one Krishna Singh @ Krishna Mahto. Similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 29828 of 2016.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33103 of 2016 (3) dt.23-08-2016 circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S Case No. 332 of 2016 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/Ibrar U T