← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41813/2026bail granted

Vinod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-30Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41813 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-390 Year-2025 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Vinod Kumar Son of Jantu Paswan Resident of Village- Gopalpur, P.S.- Sherghati, Disrict- Gaya Ji.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and apprehending his arrest in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No.390 of 2025 registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is recovery of 50 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the name of petitioner arrayed solely for the reason that the petitioner is the owner of the Toto

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41813 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/3 bearing Registration No. BRP2RA 3491 which was involved in carrying consignment of illicit liquor. It is also submitted that petitioner had given his Toto to one Vinod Kumar, who was a driver of the said vehicle, to earn money but the driver was using the said vehicle for carrying illicit liquor, without any knowledge of the petitioner. It is also submitted that recovery of illicit liquor was not made from conscious possession of this petitioner. Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not appears to be made from physical possession of this petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41813 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 3/3 learned Court of Special Excise Court No- 3, Gaya, in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No.390 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Aniket/- U T