Bhutto Yadav @ Bhuto Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38785 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2025 Thana- Rangara District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Bhutto Yadav @ Bhuto Yadav S/o Chandeshwari Yadav Resident of villageBhawanipur ,P.S- Rangra, District -Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rangra P.S. Case No. 316 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that on 25th December, 2025 at 4.45 P.M. while informant Phulan Devi along with other family members were returning to home after bogging the wheat. In the meantime, all the accused persons named in the F.I.R., including the petitioner, equipped with fire arms appeared in front of the informant. It is alleged that on the order of coaccused Subodh Yadav, accused persons fired at the head of the son of the informant, resultantly, he died on the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38785 of 2026(3) dt.28-07-2026 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 24.02.2026 and has two criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. He further submits that in the alleged incident the son of the informant died due to fire arm injury supported by Post-mortem report.

6. Having heard the rival contention of the learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary and in view of the fact that there is general allegation has been levelled against the petitioner, as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Rangra P.S. Case No. 316 of 2025.

(Alok Kumar, J) manish/- U T