Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16901/2017bail granted

Prakash Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-10Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16901 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -154 Year- 2016 Thana -NOKHA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Prakash Kumar Pandey, son of Ram Dinesh Pandey, resident of VillageManipur, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. V.R. Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shailendra Kumar -2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 28.10.2016 in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 154 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 392 Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has been made arrested in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and after his arrest he has been made accused in several other cases also and in all those cases he has been remanded within a period of two months. No recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and he has been in custody since 28.10.2016.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides, considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances and the period of custody, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16901 of 2017 (2) dt.10-04-2017 2/2 bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-V, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 154 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T